History 790
Spring, 2006
ASKING QUESTIONS
In history, as in many disciplines, the key
to finding good answers depends upon asking appropriate questions. A primary
focus of this course will be on discussions of the assigned readings. These
discussions will be based on questions submitted by the students prior to the
class sessions. Students will thus play a major role in shaping the content of
this course and subjects that we choose to discuss.
To facilitate these discussions all students
are required to submit questions based on the readings identifying the topics
that they wish to talk about each week. All questions must be posted to the
course Blackboard
no later than 9 a.m. each Wednesday. All student questions will then be posted
to the course web page on Wednesday afternoon.
Please consult the web page prior to coming to class on Wednesday to see
both your own questions and those of your classmates.
For this format to work best, it is essential
that you think about and format your questions carefully and that they be
designed to stimulate discussion. Before writing your questions, try to identify
the central theme or argument of the chapter, article, or excerpt that you have
read. This will give you guidance as to appropriate topics for discussion.
Adhere to the following guidelines in composing your questions:
James Gregory
argues, “Here is the real legacy of the Dust Bowl migration… Institutions
and outlooks imported from the Southwest have taken root; people who were once
viewed as despised outsiders now help to set community standards.”
(xvii) What evidence does
Gregory offer to support this assertion? Has
he exaggerated the conditions and contributions of the Okies.
Kevin Starr seems to be extraordinarily cynical of radicals and revolutionaries and their contribution to California history. His descriptions of figures like Upton Sinclair, and even John Steinbeck, make them seem hypocritical. I think that Starr underestimates the sincerity and significance of these people and other people on the political left.
Many writers
describe Franklin Roosevelt as the savior of capitalism. However, it was under
Roosevelt that we saw a dramatic expansion of government that was more likely to
stifle than encourage business activity. Increased taxation and the spread of
labor unions drove up the costs of doing business. Nor did the New Deal ever
bring an end to the Depression. How then, can we view FDR as the savior of
capitalism?
For examples of how other graduate students have handled this assignment see the following web site: http://bss.sfsu.edu/tygiel/hist790/default.htm