PLSI 467 Final Exam Study Guide, Fall 2002
The final will cover material from the last half of the course, plus the dominant themes from the first half. Use the list below as a guide to topics, but not as your only preparation. You are responsible for the readings, lecture material, and the 2002 election results we covered in class.
The readings for the last half draw largely from Darcy, Welch, and Clark (1994), Thomas and Wilcox (1998), and Reingold (2000).
|
Descriptive representation |
Single-transferable vote systems |
|
Substantive representation |
Runoff elections |
|
Trustee model of representation |
Electoral college |
|
Delegate model of representation |
|
|
Constituency |
Geographically identifiable groups |
|
Interests |
Large elections v. smaller elections |
|
Year of the Woman |
2002 election results, as analyzed and discussed in class |
|
Midterm congressional elections |
Comparison of women in parliaments |
|
Challengers |
Change of women in governments over time |
|
Open seats |
Differences in women in governments across the globe |
|
Incumbents |
Elazar’s political culture
categories |
|
Reapportionment |
Hostility hypothesis |
|
Redistricting |
Competition hypothesis |
|
Eligibility pool |
Traditional roles hypothesis |
|
Bottleneck |
Voter attitudes toward female candidates |
|
Socialization |
Campaigning as a woman |
|
Career preparation |
Issue congruence |
|
Education differences |
Male conspiracy in electoral politics |
|
Occupational differences |
Funding and fund raising |
|
Incumbency |
Female legislators’ similarities and differences |
|
Turnover |
Roll call votes |
|
Party changes |
Committee assignments |
|
Single-member district systems |
Leadership types |
|
Multi-member district systems |
AZ and CA 1990 legislative session |
|
Proportional representation |
Reignold’s methodology |
|
Party lists |
Similarities and differences in AZ and CA legislatures |
|
Quotas |
Reingold’s results,
interpretation, and discussion |
|
At large systems |
|
|
Mixed systems |
|